<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Unfamiliar and Beautiful Belgian Tarot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tarothistory.com/2008/03/17/an-unfamiliar-and-beautiful-belgian-tarot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tarothistory.com/2008/03/17/an-unfamiliar-and-beautiful-belgian-tarot/</link>
	<description>&#34;Over 500 years of history in 78 cards&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 04:58:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://www.tarothistory.com/2008/03/17/an-unfamiliar-and-beautiful-belgian-tarot/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarothistory.com/2008/03/17/an-unfamiliar-and-beautiful-belgian-tarot/#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Hi Bryan,

Yes, I thought so too. We discussed this deck a bit more in the forum, please take a look, and join us if you&#039;d like.

best wishes,
robert

http://forum.tarothistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&amp;t=11&amp;start=0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bryan,</p>
<p>Yes, I thought so too. We discussed this deck a bit more in the forum, please take a look, and join us if you&#8217;d like.</p>
<p>best wishes,<br />
robert</p>
<p><a href="http://forum.tarothistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&#038;t=11&#038;start=0" rel="nofollow">http://forum.tarothistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&#038;t=11&#038;start=0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.tarothistory.com/2008/03/17/an-unfamiliar-and-beautiful-belgian-tarot/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarothistory.com/2008/03/17/an-unfamiliar-and-beautiful-belgian-tarot/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>From the looks of this pack, It looks like one that was used to play the game of Trappola, rather than a tarot deck. The game was played with a deck that was numbered ace, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, page, knight, king, in the four suits that are used for tarots . The deck for the game was said to have been produced by taking a tarot deck, &amp; removing the queens (Italian decks to this day have no Queens), majors, and the numbers 3-6, leaving us with 36 cards. I suspectn that this suit of cups came from a tarot deck treated in this fashion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the looks of this pack, It looks like one that was used to play the game of Trappola, rather than a tarot deck. The game was played with a deck that was numbered ace, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, page, knight, king, in the four suits that are used for tarots . The deck for the game was said to have been produced by taking a tarot deck, &amp; removing the queens (Italian decks to this day have no Queens), majors, and the numbers 3-6, leaving us with 36 cards. I suspectn that this suit of cups came from a tarot deck treated in this fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://www.tarothistory.com/2008/03/17/an-unfamiliar-and-beautiful-belgian-tarot/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 07:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarothistory.com/2008/03/17/an-unfamiliar-and-beautiful-belgian-tarot/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Thanks Michael.

I continue to search to find a relative to the pip cards. They&#039;re so striking, and elegant, it would be a shame if these were the only ones in this style. 

I&#039;m glad you like the visual comparisons, I really enjoy comparing and contrasting these beautiful old decks. 

best,
robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Michael.</p>
<p>I continue to search to find a relative to the pip cards. They&#8217;re so striking, and elegant, it would be a shame if these were the only ones in this style. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you like the visual comparisons, I really enjoy comparing and contrasting these beautiful old decks. </p>
<p>best,<br />
robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.tarothistory.com/2008/03/17/an-unfamiliar-and-beautiful-belgian-tarot/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarothistory.com/2008/03/17/an-unfamiliar-and-beautiful-belgian-tarot/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>That is a beautiful deck. Your side-by-side comparisons are, as usual, well chosen and proof that a picture is worth a thousand words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a beautiful deck. Your side-by-side comparisons are, as usual, well chosen and proof that a picture is worth a thousand words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

